When I was a child, my siblings, cousins and I loved to tell ghost stories. As the sun set on our outdoor activities, we would gather in the corner bedroom of my grandparents’ house to try and out scare one another. We’d huddle in the dark room and spin tales designed to delight the group, even as we collectively trembled.
One summer night, we were tucked away, telling stories by flashlight. As the speaker unfurled the gory details of their story, we heard a strange sound. The room grew silent, but the sound didn’t repeat. This scenario repeated several times as the speaker returned to their story until one frightened member of the group saw knuckles tapping against the bedroom window. As the first scream erupted, the group of us leapt from the bed and began pulling, pounding and tugging on the bedroom door. It wasn’t locked, but in our fear, we couldn’t get out of the room. Finally, not wanting to create the possibility of emotionally scarring us, a chuckling parent released us from our room of terror.
Although hardly on the same scale as my anecdote, I see similar blind terror flowing freely in our country. I’m speaking, of course, of Islamaphobia, which is running rampant on social media sites, in print publications, and in the images brought to us by the nightly news. Emotionally-charged protests of Muslim mosques, the most prominent one dubbed as the “Ground Zero Mosque,” are being reported from coast to coast. Nationwide, angry and frustrated individuals are renouncing the rights of Islamic groups to establish houses of worship.
When I first heard about the “Ground Zero Mosque,” I too was angry. Like most Americans, I can tell you exactly what I was doing when I received news of the terrorist attacks on the twin towers. I remember staring in disbelief at the news reels, and crying at the sight of people jumping out of windows. I wondered how anyone could consider building a mosque on what has become hallowed ground.
But, as a writer, the impulse to dig deeper took over and I pushed feelings aside to consider some facts, most of which seem to have gotten lost amidst the political rhetoric and fear mongering. Consider the following, for example:
1. The proposed construction is for a community/cultural center – the equivalent of the Christian-based YMCA. While it will house a small interfaith prayer center, the primary plans are to include a 500-seat auditorium for cultural events, recreational facilities, and activities commonly offered at the YMCA and cultural centers.
2. The community center proposed is not even visible from Ground Zero, which is two blocks away. Also, although I’ve not been there, it is my understanding that there are much more offensive things in the immediate vicinity of Ground Zero. A house of worship, for many, would be a serious upgrade.
3. Currently, the site, which is privately owned property, houses a mosque. In fact, it’s one of three mosques in the area.
4. The current imam established the mosque last October and has proposed the community center as a means of building an interfaith bridge in the community. His wife even serves as an official advisor to the National September 11 Memorial and Museum. Both have made great efforts to bring healing and peace to the community to counteract the events and impact of 9/11.
As I move beyond these facts, I find that the voice of reason further asserts itself – especially in regards to the individuals who actually executed the plans for 9/11. Those 19 Islamic extremists have come to represent the Muslim religion and all of its followers. From pulpits and podiums around the country, many non-Muslim religious and political leaders are asserting that mosques are nothing more than a clever disguise for terrorist training grounds within our borders. Some, like a Florida church, are planning events such as a Qur’an burning on 9/11. Am I the only person who cringes at stories like this, considering similar historical events, such as the Nazi regime?
Using the same logic, wouldn’t pedophile priests represent the entire Catholic religion. Or shouldn’t Christian churches be accused of breeding terrorists such as abortion clinic bombers? And what about Timothy McVeigh? Remember him? Prior to 9/11, he successfully executed the most deadly terrorist act on our soil in Oklahoma City. As I recall, he stated that love of his church and country prompted his actions. Was his church to blame for his patriotism?
Several other things struck me as I read articles from a variety of publications on both sides of the controversy. While I can understand the distaste for a mosque so close to the site of such painful memories, it does not explain the rampant protests of sites across the country. California, Tennessee, Connecticut, and other states have reported similar protests of proposed Islamic houses of worship.
What saddens me most about this is that these protests are against law abiding, taxpaying, American citizens whose children were born in our hospitals and attend American schools. In fact, a growing number of American Muslims are requesting law enforcement protection in order to attend their mosque. Isn’t fear of harm and religious persecution why our forefathers braved the journey across the ocean to come to the Americas? Isn’t freedom from such actions what this country is built upon?
It certainly is. But more and more, our country is starting to resemble the very countries at which we shake our heads in pity. While we understandably bristle at the supposition by Islamic extremists that America is evil, we demonize an entire religion for the actions of a few. We criticize countries that declare a national religion and prohibit the establishment of other religions, then try to deny that freedom for a religion that frightens us because we don’t understand it or have sufficient knowledge of its beliefs. Born from that fear is an unwillingness to know the people who reflect what’s good about Islam.
Once again, we are at a crossroads in this country. We can leap blindly in any direction that seems to promise safety. Or, we can pause to identify and effectively deal with the real monsters. Ultimately, the choice we make as a nation will determine if we truly treasure the values of our constitution, or if it’s become an obsolete weapon that we deploy only when it directly benefits those of whom we’re not afraid.